🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 is remembered as one of the deadliest – and significant – occasions throughout three decades of unrest in this area.

Throughout the area where events unfolded – the memories of Bloody Sunday are visible on the structures and seared in collective memory.

A civil rights march was conducted on a cold but bright day in the city.

The march was challenging the practice of detention without trial – holding suspects without due process – which had been put in place after three years of conflict.

Soldiers from the Parachute Regiment fatally wounded multiple civilians in the neighborhood – which was, and remains, a predominantly nationalist population.

A specific visual became particularly iconic.

Photographs showed a clergyman, Father Daly, using a stained with blood fabric in his effort to protect a group moving a teenager, Jackie Duddy, who had been killed.

News camera operators captured much footage on the day.

The archive contains Father Daly telling a media representative that soldiers "appeared to shoot indiscriminately" and he was "completely sure" that there was no provocation for the gunfire.

This account of the incident wasn't accepted by the original examination.

The Widgery Tribunal determined the Army had been shot at first.

During the negotiation period, the ruling party set up a fresh examination, following pressure by family members, who said Widgery had been a whitewash.

That year, the findings by the investigation said that generally, the soldiers had initiated shooting and that not one of the individuals had posed any threat.

The then government leader, the leader, issued an apology in the House of Commons – stating deaths were "without justification and inexcusable."

Authorities began to examine the incident.

An ex-soldier, known as the defendant, was charged for killing.

Indictments were filed regarding the killings of one victim, 22, and 26-year-old another victim.

The defendant was also accused of attempting to murder Patrick O'Donnell, additional persons, further individuals, an additional individual, and an unknown person.

Remains a court ruling protecting the soldier's identity protection, which his attorneys have claimed is necessary because he is at threat.

He told the Saville Inquiry that he had solely shot at people who were possessing firearms.

The statement was disputed in the final report.

Evidence from the examination was unable to be used immediately as testimony in the legal proceedings.

During the trial, the defendant was shielded from sight using a privacy screen.

He spoke for the initial occasion in the proceedings at a proceeding in that month, to answer "not responsible" when the allegations were presented.

Relatives of the victims on Bloody Sunday travelled from Derry to the courthouse every day of the trial.

A family member, whose sibling was fatally wounded, said they always knew that attending the proceedings would be emotional.

"I remember the events in my recollection," the relative said, as we visited the primary sites referenced in the case – from the location, where his brother was shot dead, to the nearby the courtyard, where one victim and William McKinney were died.

"It even takes me back to my location that day.

"I participated in moving my brother and place him in the ambulance.

"I relived each detail during the testimony.

"But even with experiencing everything – it's still valuable for me."