🔗 Share this article

The tobacco company stands accused of “utter hypocrisy” for lobbying against tobacco control measures in Africa which are already enforced in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

A letter obtained by media sent from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.

The corporation is pursuing modifications of a proposed legislation that include decreasing the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year die from smoking-associated diseases, according to WHO calculations.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

Global industry interference concerns

The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about corporate intervention with public health regulations. Recently, international health experts issued a warning that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of business advocacy everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, delayed regulations in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” commented the corporate monitoring director.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The anti-smoking legislation being considered by Zambia’s parliament includes proposals to go further UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and stipulating that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Business countermeasures

Via documentation, the company recommends this be reduced to 30% or 50% “according to global guideline limits”, postponed for minimum twelve months after the bill passes.

Global health authorities specifically advises a caution must occupy at least half of the product container front “and attempt to encompass as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings are required to occupy nearly two-thirds of a cigarette pack surfaces.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the elimination of comprehensive limitations on flavoured tobacco products, arguing that it would push consumers toward “black market” products. It suggests restricting fewer varieties of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Every scented tobacco product have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The draft bill suggests penalties for different infractions “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Corporate defense

In the letter, the company executive of the African subsidiary claims the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the related medical consequences” but maintains that “certain measures can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “weaken this legislation so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We exist in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my property and collect the yield and market the products – and my offspring don't use tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are perishing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator said: “BAT Zambia conducts its activities following with relevant national regulations. Moreover, the firm contributes in the state's regulatory development in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for relevant group engagement in policymaking.”

The company was “not resisting legislation”, the representative commented, mentioning that minors should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to achieve intended public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, mentioning that the corporation's recommendations “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which includes growing volumes of illegal commerce”.

The nation's ministry of trade, commerce and industry was solicited for statement.